Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

First Class Tyres & Autocare
Sponsored by
For tyres, exhausts, brakes and autocare in Uppingham and surrounding area call 01572 822100
 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Parking adds to dangers on crossing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 September 2008
The pedestrian crossing on Melton Road has repeatedly been the cause of safety issues and yet again a near miss reported by Claire Raws (letters two weeks ago) highlights the need for immediate action.
I have personally witnessed three such incidents in the last month and have also observed that the problem is being compounded by the illegal parking.

All manner of vehicles including large commercial trucks and vans routinely park on the zig zag lines six days a week while visiting the bakery.

This often obscures the view of traffic approaching from the town and when pedestrians are four or five paces onto the crossing, motorists have little or no time to react.

This unsafe and illegal practice carries a £60 fine and three points on the offender's licence but the law is not being enforced.

I recently spoke to a traffic warden voicing my concerns and he explained that they have no powers to deal with this issue as the police have retained this section of the law as part of their remit.

So there it is, the wardens are powerless to act and the authorities don't seem bothered, meanwhile pedestrians continue to run the gauntlet until a serious accident prompts the powers that be to stop sitting on their hands and take action.

Nigel Pleasants
via email




I appreciate your cartoonist's sense of humour (letters last week) but that crossing is no joke and I fully agree with Ms Rawes.

My wife and I separately and on several occasions have had 'near misses.'

In my view this type of crossing is not suitable for a busy road with a dual carriageway section where the nearside driver and the pedestrian can both be unsighted because of the other lanes of traffic.

The crossing should have pedestrian operated traffic lights as in the case of the other corssings in the High Street on this same main route.

It is a busy enough crossing and is used by many school children.

Raymond Hobbs
Oakham

The full article contains 341 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 9:23 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Rutland
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Have traffic wardens made shopping easier in our towns?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.